4/25/2024
Today from Hiiraan Online:  _
advertisements
New kid on block joins traditional donors – aid report
A man unloads rice from a humanitarian food convoy that arrived from the Malian capital Bamako in the northeastern city of Gao, Picture June 12, 2012. REUTERS/Adama Diarra
Reuters.gif
Thursday, July 18, 2013

advertisements
Can you name the five biggest humanitarian aid donors last year? No prizes for guessing the United States gave the most, but up there at number four is Turkey.

And if you look at donations compared to national wealth, Turkey was the third most generous country – well ahead of the United States. Only Luxembourg and Sweden gave more aid in relation to their gross national income (GNI).

Turkey donated over $1 billion in humanitarian aid last year, just behind Britain ($1.17 bn), the European Union ($1.88 bn) and the United States ($3.80 bn).

The surprise rankings are revealed in this year’s Global Humanitarian Assistance (GHA) report released on Wednesday, which shows that overall global humanitarian aid fell 8 percent in 2012 from 2011.

It is likely a large proportion of Turkey’s donations went to the surrounding region, especially to victims of the Syrian crisis on its doorstep. Turkey has taken in some 350,000 refugees from Syria's civil war and has helped other countries hosting refugees.

"Turkey has emerged as a significant deliverer of humanitarian assistance in recent years,” said Dan Coppard, Director of Research, Analysis and Evidence at Development Initiatives which published the report.

“There are a number of potential reasons for this, including the fact that they are supporting large numbers of refugees and providing regional assistance in relation to the Syria crisis, and also that their reporting may have improved.”

Turkey’s humanitarian assistance has traditionally focused on a small number of recipients, predominantly Pakistan, Somalia and Iraq. In 2011, Somalia was the largest recipient and Turkish Prime Minster Recep Tayyip Erdogan became the first non-African leader to visit the anarchic state in over 20 years.

The report points out that while a number of donors and non-governmental organisations work in Somalia from regional hubs in Nairobi, Turkey’s aid agencies are more visible on the ground in Somalia.

SOMALIA TRAGEDY                                                                     

Turkey’s new prominence illustrates the increasingly important role of non-traditional donors.

“This is probably part of a wider trend,” Coppard said. “Traditional, western donors provide the majority of international humanitarian assistance (over 90 percent since 2007) but the balance is shifting: non-traditional donors' contributions are increasing and these countries have the potential to make significant and valuable contributions, both to humanitarian assistance and overall development aid.”

But the overall picture of who gives what is still far from clear, and much better reporting is needed to get a more accurate idea, he said.

The fact that overall humanitarian aid fell in 2012 is partly because there were no “mega-disasters” like the Haiti earthquake or the Japanese tsunami. The report describes 2012 as the “year of recurring disasters”, highlighting the persistent exposure of the world’s poorest people to crises.

The publication also pulls together statistics that show the shocking impact of the hunger crisis in Somalia, which killed an estimated 257,500 people - half of them children under five - between October 2010 and March 2012.

One stark graph, which contrasts the number of deaths per month with aid contributions, demonstrates the dire effects of the international community’s delayed response to the unfolding crisis despite advance warnings.

In late 2012 the United Nations announced a three-year consolidated appeal for Somalia, the first of its kind, and a major advance in efforts to push for more predictable funding for chronic crises.

The report’s key recommendations to donors include:

  • providing more predictable multi-year funding for chronic crises
  • spending more on disaster prevention and preparedness in close collaboration with the governments of affected countries (still only 4.7 percent of the total in 2011)
  • focusing on early response and the interconnectedness of risk
  • promoting access to information

The report in figures:

  • Global humanitarian aid fell by 8 percent from $19.4 bn in 2011 to $17.9 bn in 2012
  • The United Nations targeted 76 million people for humanitarian assistance in 2012, compared with 93 million people in 2011
  • Spain reduced its humanitarian assistance by half, Japan by 38 percent and the United States by 11 percent
  • Only 62.7 percent of U.N. humanitarian appeals were met in 2012 - the lowest for a decade. This funding gap has increased year on year since 2007
  • Pakistan, Somalia and the West Bank/Gaza Strip received the most humanitarian assistance in 2011 (the latest year for which recipients’ figures exist). Pakistan received $1.4 bn, Somalia $1.1 bn, and the West Bank/Gaza Strip $849 m


 





Click here